
Ubehebe Crater in Morning Shade. Death Valley. 2012.
THE VIEW FROM HERE
by Stephen Johnson
RAW Processors plus Photoshop
Much has been said in the last few years about the wonders of Adobe Lightroom and the obsolescence of Photoshop. Lightroom is remarkable and powerful. In many forums however, I remind people that for all of their power and conveniences, Adobe's Camera RAW, and Lightroom, Apple's Aperture, and PhaseOne's Capture One are after all RAW processors, not image editors in the same sense of Photoshop's flexibility and pixel by pixel precision. I believe that Photoshop remains an absolutely critical ingredient in image editing.
Many photographers are simply put off by the complexity of Photoshop, the seemingly endless array of options and elaborate workflows abounding on the internet. Others simply want the flexibility of RAW without all of the work and time that finishing the image in Photoshop implies. The cost differential is also real. I can understand all of these notions, but want to discuss a few of them here.
Photoshop need not be too much more complex than what your needs and knowledge desire. There certainly is no imperative that you do as much stuff to your photograph as possible just because you can. I teach a fairly straightforward path through Photoshop that needs little more in most cases than a few Adjustment Layers for some tone and color needs, some so called "sharpening" and some image tone-balance work for prints. I go through much of this in the Selections, Adjustment Layers, Tone and Color Workshop coming up next weekend February 11-12, 2012.
One thing I've always liked about Lightroom and RAW processors in general is that there is no encouragement of composited faking of photographs inherent in the software. I think this encourages a straight forward workflow which is where in my interest in photography primarily lies. The image database is also useful, but not for me as I use other approaches and simply have way too many photographs over too many decades for it to be as useful to me as it is for some. The Lightroom Virtual Copy is great, as well as some of the stylistic and annotation automation.
As I am not a regular Lightroom or Aperture user, there are no doubt other features that I haven't yet noticed. But even in a program I know well, like Photoshop, I am constantly noticing, or having things pointed out to me that I had not seen, either in development or post-release.
But for me, Photoshop's shipping companion Camera RAW is just simpler to use. I find the tabs in CameraRaw very direct and I work well with the interface. The tight integration between Adobe's browser Bridge, CameraRAW and Photoshop is a relationship I find very convenient and empowering.

When it comes to precision editing, the RAW processors are great for basic interpretation of the RAW data, but I would feel deeply limited if I didn't have Photoshop at my disposal for precise editing, even pixel by pixel for some picky issues. I would also feel very constrained in my ability to fine tune the image for printing. That is why I discourage people from printing through Lightroom or Aperture as that decision bypasses many of the finishing and balance options I have and need in Photoshop.
The non-destructive editing metaphor which many have picked up on from Lightroom, and is inherent in RAW processing, has been in place in Photoshop for a very long time. Photoshop's Layers feature was dramatically empowered with the introduction of Adjustment Layer editors a long time ago.
It is only with Photoshop's precision and iterative editing that I feel that I can really work an image into a fine print. Critical to my printmaking capabilities is the careful balancing of tone, density, nuances of color imbalance and careful attention to the optical illusions of "sharpening" and texture. Without these controls, I feel like I would be left in a more crude position than I was in a conventional darkroom in terms of careful interpretation of the image.
Many of the needed capabilities of image editing continue to grow in the RAW processors, as a new preview of Adobe's Camera RAW by product manager Bryan O'Neil Hughes demonstrates. Check it out.
 Dune Shadows and Brush. Death Valley. 2012
Tidbits
A few things I would like you to keep in mind...
Virtual Education: Our Virtual Consulting and Mentoring Program is working well. Readers of this Newsletter can still get a 20% discount by mentioning this reference when you enroll.
Catch Steve Live: Steve will be speaking here and there around the country over the next few months, April in MA, June in NY, late June in Maine, early August in MI.
Three Recent Photographs

Aerial, Confluence of Missouri and Mississippi Rivers near St. Louis. 2011.
.
The Enola Gay. Air and Space Museum Annex. 2011.

Gulls on Beach. 2011.
Here are A few little tweaks to an existing video using Photoshop CS6 Video Editing in conjunction with the power of Photoshop Adjustment Layers, Straightening, and Titles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpuFLv83iuM&feature=plcp&context=C437bcffVDvjVQa1PpcFN2Mu0NpEKhynmW9qTScZgfZrZ3ZQRkjBE%3D
THE VIEW FROM HERE
by
Stephen Johnson
Staying With Making Art
I've been immersed in printing for weeks now, first filling an important print order, then teaching a four day printing workshop
helping my students shape their photographs onto paper. It feels
tangible, substantial, real, like prints in hand always do. It felt like
a good winter indoor activity as the calendar turns to plans for for
spring outings.
Years ago we started the Featured Print Program
to make one of my photographs available every month at a very
reasonable price. But there were some other internal reasons for the
program. To put it simply, it forced finished work out of me. It is easy
to get overwhelmed by the day to day, in these days of economic stress
even more so. It is easy to loose our ways as artists, to forget the
making of artworks at our core. I've found it important to construct
internal imperatives that force the work, so that the making of art with
all of its passion, does not get routinely buried in the must do tasks of business maintenance. Having to make a new, finished print every month has helped force the issue.
Some
who work in the arts can simply follow their art making as a daily
routine. Some live very simply, some start off well to do, some retire
into a life in the arts, some make a good living from their art. But we
all need push sometimes, and most have plenty that can get in the way.
Many
of us involved in the love of landscape end up in a very different
daily routine. It takes time and effort to go out and make work. Keeping
up with the offloading and sampling, much like developing and proofing
of days now gone, is a very separate process. It doesn't feel like
making art. It feels like a task. It can be joyful if the work is
breaking exotic ground, but good solid seeing with workman-like
dedication is harder sometimes to push through entropy.
New
projects, new ideas, new territories, all contribute, but the hard core
discipline to go at it everyday is rare, and important. On the days
when it comes easy it is precious. On those days when it seems there are
a thousand things in the way, the tasks get exaggerated and the work
enticement of the art gets romanced, then easily tarnished by the fact
that it may be merely good, without necessarily being monumental. Not to
mention the fact that making art is hard work.
A
finished print in hand can help serving as a sense of accomplishment.
Much like a potter's finished firing, a print is the thing, the
tangible manifestation that allows us to move to the next piece, whether
a print or a journey. Sometimes just the getting out is enough to stir
up the pot, break the routine, and entice more to be done. The weight of the unfinished is the killer of the yet to be imagined. Somehow
a balance must be struck, so that the enticement of seduction keeps
producing more, and that realization of the finished image as print
becomes the path to moving on to the next.

Culvert and Grass. Pacifica, California. 2012.

Dancing Flyers. Pacifica. 2012.
Fundamentally,
it is simply important to continue to work, to make art, seek the
experience, persevere through the doldrums. Just do it, even if its just
effort and not necessarily inspiration. It can come to you.
In the middle of writing this column, I forced myself out into a chilly
afternoon, brought my dog along for a walk, and was then unexpectedly
rewarded with a sky full of paragliders. I would not have guessed they
would have been out in the cold air. They were magical.
Process, Craft and Media Informing an Audience
Our
viewers come to understand what they are seeing in our artwork in many
ways. One of the traditional vehicles of some comprehension was to
understand the media and materials used in constructing the art work,
oil on wood, pastels on board, cast bronze, collage, silk-screen, etc.
In this
digital photographic age, we seemed to have moved away from this
tradition. There seems to be a reluctance to call an inkjet print what
it is, coining words like "giclee." Many hold desires to continue to
call an artwork a photograph long after it has been changed into
something quite different than the word photograph implies.
This comes up again and again,as it just did in my Fine Art Printing class
last weekend, and it likely will continue to as long as people show
images that appear to be photographic, that are in fact heavily "altered
realities" and seem to want to engage their viewers with a wink and a
nod.
There is
a long tradition of deriving all sorts of artwork from photographs,
making absolutely wild and wonderful new media. That continues to be the
case, where all sort of possibilities can flow from a photograph in
this digital age. What has changed is the implied deception now possible
with digital technology, allowing drastic changes to what could be
captured with light and lens. Even with heavy fabrication, some image
makers still want to imply that the construct is what they saw and
recorded. There would be no objection to informing their audience of the
nature of what they are seeing if it were not for enjoying the reality
shift and taking credit for the image as though it was seen rather than
constructed. I'd rather they took credit for their Photoshop skills and
helped their audience understand.
This is
all a little confusing, making remarkable scenes captured be suspected
of fakery, and creating a world of unreal expectation that the lesser of
us must just not be as talented because we aren't getting or seeing
these remarkable scenes to photograph that never existed in the first
place. It also creates a false expectation of what reality is, making
the beautiful sunset before you somehow less, as it is not as wild as
the one just seen on the "enhanced" postcards in the gift shop.
I
believe this also breaks down a commitment to craft up front, in the
camera. The old "fix it in post" adage comes to mind where an assumption
is made that you'll make it good later. Instead of concentrating on
holding a magical image, this line of thought encourages a view that the
image can be cleaned-up and made magic in Photoshop. In lectures across
the country, and various parts of the world, I continue to emphasize my
conviction that the photograph is made in the camera, everything else
is just trying to process it into revealing that magic.
Indulge
yourself with any direction you please, but give the viewer a fair
chance at understanding the context of what they are seeing. Photography
does occupy a special place in our visual world in terms of its ability
to hold a light scene. Inspiration runs deep, deception can be
disturbing. Of course, part of art is, as Picasso once said "a lie that
helps you see the truth." I'm deeply aware of the gray areas that abound
here, the rich history of images derived from photographs, and that
artistic freedom demands just that: freedom.
A Few Quotes
Of
course, there will always be those who look only at technique, who ask
‘how’, while others of a more curious nature will ask ‘why’. Personally,
I have always preferred inspiration to information.
Man Ray
The days you work are the best days.
Georgia O’Keeffe
My favorite thing is to go where I’ve never been.
Diane Arbus
This
benefit of seeing... can come only if you pause a while, extricate
yourself from the maddening mob of quick impressions ceaselessly
battering our lives, and look thoughtfully at a quiet image... the
viewer must be willing to pause, to look again, to meditate.
Dorothea Lange
The weight of the unfinished is a killer of the yet to be imagined.
Stephen Johnson, from this Newsletter
Tidbits
A few things I would like you to keep in mind...
Virtual Education: Our Virtual Consulting and Mentoring Program is working well. Readers of this Newsletter can still get a 20% discount by mentioning this reference when you enroll.
Catch Steve Live:
Steve will be speaking here and there around the country over the next
few months, April in MA, June in NY, late June in Maine, early August in
MI.
- The Fine Art of Photography Event
Plymouth, MA
April 12, 7pm
- With a New Eye
George Eastman House. Rochester, NY
Thursday June 14, 2012. 6pm
- Maine Media Workshops Artists Lecture
Rockport, ME
June 26, 2012
- Summer Weekend of Photography and Digital Imaging
Southwestern Michigan Council of Camera Clubs
Hope College,
Holland, MI
Saturday August 4, 2012
Workshop: 9-11am
Artist's Lecture: 7pm
- Keynote at PSA International Conference of Photography
South San Francisco. September 20, 2012.
|